InfoCrypto

Dollar Cost Averaging Calculator

Dollar-cost averaging buys a fixed amount at fixed intervals regardless of price. This models what that produces against a single lump-sum purchase.

Last reviewed: Written and checked by the InfoCrypto editorial team
years

Your realistic average entry — usually between the two.

What dollar-cost averaging does

Dollar-cost averaging means investing a fixed amount at fixed intervals, regardless of price. Because the amount is fixed rather than the quantity, you automatically buy more units when the price is low and fewer when it is high.

Units acquired = Σ (amount ÷ price at each purchase) Average price = total invested ÷ total units

That average is a harmonic mean rather than an arithmetic one, and it is always at or below the arithmetic average of the prices you bought at. This is a genuine mathematical property of the method, not marketing.

This calculator asks for your realistic average entry price rather than simulating a price path, because inventing a price series would create a false impression of precision. Use the actual average if you are reviewing past purchases, or a considered estimate if you are planning.

Averaging versus lump sum

The honest comparison is uncomfortable for both camps.

Mathematically, lump sum usually wins. Studies across long equity histories find that investing everything immediately beats spreading it out roughly two thirds of the time, simply because markets rise more often than they fall, and money invested earlier is exposed to that rise for longer.

Behaviourally, averaging usually wins. It requires no timing decision, removes the regret of committing everything just before a fall, and is far easier to sustain through a drawdown. In an asset that routinely falls 70 %, a method you can actually keep following beats one that is slightly better on paper and that you abandon.

The relevant question is not which has the higher expected return but which you will actually execute. An automated weekly purchase that continues through a bear market beats a perfectly reasoned lump-sum plan that never gets placed.

Doing it properly

  • Automate it. A recurring order removes the monthly decision, which is the point. Deciding each month whether “now is a good time” recreates the problem averaging was meant to solve.
  • Watch the fees. Frequent small purchases can be expensive. A fixed fee of €2 on a €50 weekly buy is 4 %, which will cost you more than any timing benefit. Monthly purchases are often the better compromise.
  • Write down the exit rule at the start. Averaging in is a plan for buying; it says nothing about when to stop or sell, and that decision is where most of the emotion lives.
  • Keep tax records. Every purchase is a separate cost-basis lot. Dozens of small buys over years become a serious record-keeping exercise if you do not export as you go.
  • It is not a guarantee. Averaging into an asset that goes to zero produces a loss just as surely as a lump sum. It manages timing risk, not the risk that the thing is worthless.

Frequently asked questions

Is DCA better than timing the market?

Almost certainly, for almost everyone, because reliable market timing is not a skill most people have. The comparison that actually matters is against lump-sum investing, where the evidence favours lump sum on expected return and favours averaging on the likelihood you stick with it.

How often should I buy?

Frequency matters less than consistency and fees. Weekly, fortnightly and monthly produce very similar outcomes over multi-year periods. Choose whichever keeps transaction costs to a small fraction of each purchase.

Should I stop during a crash?

Stopping during falls removes the mechanism's main advantage — that is precisely when your fixed amount buys the most units. That said, if a fall has changed your view of whether the asset is worth owning at all, that is a thesis question and a legitimate reason to stop.